| Cinderella 
                    Man  
                      What is it about the sport of boxing that punctures right 
                      through everything on the surface into the core of human 
                      drama? It could be that we are born to rely solely upon 
                      ourselves. It could also be that our very being depends 
                      on our ability to make something of what was given to us 
                      at birth. Like last year’s phenomenal Million 
                      Dollar Baby, Ron Howard’s latest film tells 
                      a story of a pugilist protagonist who struggles to rise 
                      through the muck of social injustice, but this time during 
                      a little dark corner of American History we like to call 
                      the Great Depression. 
                     Eschewing 
                      the melodic brilliance of Eastwood’s minimalist approach, 
                      Howard’s stance is a bit more traditional, and a bit 
                      more studio in tone. In fact, had this film been produced 
                      at any other time by the studio system, it would likely 
                      be trumped up at yet another slickly produced historical 
                      human interest drama, yet Howard somehow manages to look 
                      past all of this and see the added relevance that this story 
                      packs when paralleled with the fears of today’s economic 
                      climate. Sure, 
                      we aren’t in the midst of any national crisis, yet. 
                      But discuss economic conditions with any coastal dweller 
                      living in a metropolis of moderate size and chances are 
                      the cost of either a) living, and/or b) gas will be brought 
                      up rather quickly and chances are, a discussion of the job 
                      market and its sagging trends will not be too far in tow. The 
                      story at hand is that of James Braddock (Russell Crowe), 
                      a boxer who falls on bad times along with everyone else 
                      in the country when the stock market came crashing down. 
                      Braddock had it all, pre-crash, as he was a successful and 
                      undefeated fighter whose earnings had been, at the time, 
                      wisely invested in stocks and bonds. Howard’s hand 
                      is steady as we see Braddock’s family move from a 
                      comfortable upper-middle class lifestyle to the cusp of 
                      skid row. Despite their struggles, Braddock is still fighting. 
                      However, now he is fighting injured, relying on whatever 
                      purse he can scrape up to keep the gas and electric flowing 
                      to the tiny Braddock apartment. 
          After 
                      a disparaging match, in which both boxers appear to be dancing 
                      for their paychecks rather than actually boxing for title 
                      shots, Braddock is decommissioned, losing any hope for his 
                      family’s survival. Braddock’s stilted match 
                      was largely due to his decision to box with a broken arm, 
                      knowing that his family needed the money more than he needed 
                      to go without further pain. Howard plays these cards well, 
                      and knows that deep down each and every one of us fears 
                      that these days may darken American soil one day in the 
                      near future. 
              		    |  |  Russell 
                      Crowe, who is either a “take ‘em” or “leave 
                      ‘em” actor in my book, manages to pull off the 
                      role in a convincing enough manner. His performance brought 
                      to mind a recent conversation regarding George Clooney. 
                      My brother mentioned that he could care less for Clooney 
                      because he essentially brings the same performance to each 
                      character, at which point he proceeded to do his best Clooney 
                      impersonation, head bob and all. Being a fan of Clooney’s 
                      work this was difficult to understand at first, until watching 
                      Cinderella Man. Crowe 
                      essentially brings “Crowe” to each role, but 
                      here he surpassed himself, making one forget that “Russell 
                      Crowe” is onscreen and instead sinking into the telling 
                      of Braddock’s struggles to survive during the Great 
                      Depression. He is completely believable as a man who would 
                      rather brutalize himself in the ring then watch as his family 
                      suffers as he fails to get selected for work at the docks 
                      day to day. Renee Zellweger also manages to lose herself 
                      in a role that could easily have been one note in its depiction. 
                      Screenwriters Akiva Goldsman and Cliff Hollingsworth wisely 
                      inject the voices of several wives at crucial points, contradicting 
                      what was once mistaken as idle contentment with the husbands’ 
                      choices to physically risk it all with an internal struggle 
                      of mental strain and concern for the well being of their 
                      loved ones. Visually, 
                      Howard and cinematographer Salvatore Totino manage to find 
                      new ways to make the drama within the ring look anew. Chaotic 
                      and often confusing, the camera tends to look away from 
                      the action, adding a new found frustration to the usual 
                      ebb and flow of filmic ring antics. Usually, the most brutal 
                      blows are rendered in slow motion close-up, just in case 
                      viewers couldn’t make out the contortions of fist-to-face 
                      brutalization occurring with each punch. The 
                      key difference here is that Totino sometimes pulls the camera 
                      away, just as a vital blow is set to be delivered, and instead 
                      gives us a glimpse of the audience members’ reactions 
                      from a perspective fixed within the ring. This isn’t 
                      a fighter’s viewpoint, mind you, as when the camera 
                      pans back to the action the fighters remain ever engaged 
                      in fisticuffs. This is more like a “ghost’s-eye-view” 
                      of historic events as they occur, and it adds enough spice 
                      to keep us on the edge of our seats. The 
                      other stylistic improvement upon the fighting sequences 
                      is the attention paid to the action occurring between rounds. 
                      The corner men are often reduced to clichés in films 
                      such as this, offering rigid advice in gravely yells between 
                      rounds. Here we are presented with Joe Gould (Paul Giamatti), 
                      who is in many ways the antithesis of the standard corner 
                      man stereotype. Joe isn’t the derelict guru that was 
                      unearthed from whatever rock he was hiding under, instead 
                      he is a socialite whose prowess in shoehorning talent into 
                      profitable bouts has struggled with the decline in economic 
                      climate, but not so much to send him packing out of his 
                      posh Manhattan apartment. Gould is in good with the big 
                      boys of Madison Square Garden post-crash, and this plays 
                      a larger role in the later acts, as Braddock comes, hat 
                      in hand, asking for a handout for his family’s sake. 
                      After all, he made these men rich in his prime, it should 
                      be a given that they contribute to a relief fund for his 
                      kids. Giamatti, 
                      once again, offers a performance that is so delicately nuanced 
                      that a nod should be warranted during award season, but 
                      whether he will go on overlooked yet again remains to be 
                      seen. He plays Gould in lush three dimensional tones, and 
                      the arc taken is so well shielded that even the keenest 
                      of eyes will take heart in the outcome. Rating: 
                        
   |