When George Reeves
put a bullet in his head, TV-addicted kids in America were
devastated. If indeed that was what happened. Allegedly
despondent over his type-casting as Superman, the 45-year-old
actor went upstairs one night and never came down. Some
friends swore he couldn't have killed himself, that it had
to have been murder. And sure, there were just enough sordid
details to his life that maybe, just maybe, someone else
pulled the trigger on that luger.
Of course, no
one can prove it. So right from the start, Hollywoodland
has a tough row to hoe. Taking speculation from the book
Hollywood Kryptonite, The Bulldog, the Lady, and the Death of Superman and an upcoming biography of
Reeves, screenwriter Paul Bernbaum tries out a few theories,
funneled through the investigation of real-life private
detective Louis Simo (Adrien Brody).
Perhaps forcing
a noir feel a bit, Bernbaum and Director Allen Coulter
present Simo as a detective down on his luck. Somewhat debauched
but not unhappy about it, the seedy Simo spends most of
his time trailing unfaithful spouses. It's steady work,
but not the kind that makes a man what you'd call a success.
When he gets
a tip from an old partner that Helen Bessolo (Lois Smith)
wants to investigate her son George Reeves' (Ben Affleck)
suicide, Simo sees the big time. A real Hollywood crime
gets the headlines, and the headlines gets the big bucks.
Conveniently,
or accurately, as Simo investigates, he also has to sort
through the grief of his son Evan (Zach Mills). It gives
a personal focus to the devastation of kids everywhere.
With Superman gone, Evan lost his role model; Dad had already
walked out on the family years ago.
Hollywoodland
offers a rough parallel chronology. Following Simo on his
awkward path back to dignity as a man, the film intercuts
his investigation with key points in Reeves' life. Some
of them bear directly on his death; some just show how George
Reeves became blessed and cursed as the idol of millions
everywhere.
The problem
with this structure is that Hollywood keeps losing
track of its focus. Though Affleck delivers a true star
turn as Reeves, the script won't let him be the main character
in his own life story. Instead, he's often charming and
little else, cruising along as outside forces affect his
fortunes.
Among those
forces would be Toni Mannix (Diane Lane), the wife of studio
mogul Eddie Mannix (Bob Hoskins). Though Reeves was with
Lenore Lemmon (Robin Tunney) when he died, it's Mannix who
was clearly the love of his life. Years older - the film
stays a bit vague as to how much older - Mannix literally
kept Reeves through most of his years as Superman.
Is it her story?
Is it Lenore's? Or is it that Hollywoodland wants
to convince us that it's all something like Chinatown? The
whole place is just corrupt, and though Reeves was no innocent,
neither he nor later Simo are really prepared for the casual
cruelty and amorality that pervades the movie business.
Er, pervaded.
The film does
a good job of showing the harsh realities of Hollywood(land).
With all the glitter and glamour, it gets hard to separate
the hope from the hype. If Reeves did shoot himself, the
film makes a good case for his despondency.
It might be
hard to grasp the power of Reeves' image as Superman now.
He wasn't the first to play him, but he was the one in the
nascent days of television's power; the script claims that
ninety percent of family homes with televisions watched
The Adventures of Superman. Right now, it's impossible
to think of 90% of a demographic (and this was before "demographics")
coming together on anything.
Where the pull
really comes is that the interesting story isn't Simo's,
because ultimately, his discoveries and conclusions are
dramatized speculation. Every time the film goes to Reeves,
that's where we want to stay. But the split structure sometimes
leave the Reeves scenes too soon, and more like pieces of
a jigsaw puzzle than a coherent narrative.
Perhaps ironically,
this could be the role that rehabilitates Ben Affleck's
career. For the first time in a while, the guy is really
acting, working on matching his cadences to Reeves', altering
his voice a bit and trying not to use his own charm. While
not imitation, his performance does get at some insights
to the character, and the dichotomy of a man torn between
his own interests and a sense of obligation to the children
that idolized him. Again, that's the interesting
story.
It's not that
Brody fails, either. He has nuances with Simo, subtly growing
into self-awareness and past self-loathing into something
better. That performance helps Hollywoodland reach
for something deep in its conclusion. Yet it still feels
vaguely unsatisfying.
Deeply satisfying
though underwritten, Diane Lane takes a bold step in portraying
Toni Mannix. Aged quite effectively, she underplays Mannix'
desperation and strange affection for her husband. When
Hoskins has a tender scene with her late in the film, it's
almost like something out of The Great Gatsby.
Most of the
other characters come across as pretty one-note, just to
make the whole thing feel like noir. They're less
people than attitudes, though some, like Joe Spano and Tunney,
seem to be having fun with it.
Yet
this story isn't fun. It's sad, and if it had sharper focus,
it could have been heartbreaking.