Hart's War
You
know the drill: wealthy son of privilege gets a cushy and hopefully
violence-free military assignment during wartime. Eventually this soft-handed
girly-man will come face to face with a grizzled warhorse (tooth-clenched
cigar optional). Their two ideologies clash even as real war rages around
them, and eventually both emerge as better men than they were before.
Luckily, Hart's
War has more on its mind than that. True, Tom Hart (Colin Farrell)
has clearly not done a day's work in his life. The most stressful part
of his assignment during near-mythic The Battle of The Bulge involves
delivering a case of champagne to field headquarters.
But on that fateful
delivery day, Hart gets stopped by Nazis disguised as Allied MPs. His
attempt to escape only ends up in a ditch, lying bleeding on a field
of frozen white corpses. By his standards, the tortures the Nazis put
him through are rigorous, and after a few days he will do anything to
put shoes on his tender feet.
The movie takes
a stab at building suspense over what Hart did to get released from
torture and into a regular stalag. As far as Colonel William McNamara
(Bruce Willis), the ranking officer of the American prisoners, is concerned,
the Nazis paid Hart thirty pieces of shoe leather. But really, Hart's
betrayal serves as nothing more than a macguffin to get him to the camp
and to the issues really at hand: honor, strength of character, and
racism.
|
I know my career's
in here somewhere...
|
Don't believe the
advertisements. Despite thrilling explosions delivered in 30-second
spots, Hart's War wants to be more of a think piece, wedging
a courtroom drama in the midst of a prison camp. And it raises some
interesting ideas.
Two members of
the (now)famed Tuskegee Airmen are shipped to the camp and placed under
Hart's watch in the enlisted men's quarters. There they face open hostility,
particularly from Sergeant Bedford (Cole Hauser), a guy who bravely
risks getting shot to hurl bread at the Soviet prisoners across the
fence, but whose spirit of brotherhood is only one step above the Nazis.
Bedford reveals
his nastier side by planting a weapon in the black Lt. Archer's bunk,
"forcing" their German captors to execute him on the spot. So when the
jerk ends up dead in the snow with Archer's fellow Tuskegee Airman Lt.
Scott (Terrence Dasheon Howard) standing over him, the Nazis can only
assume murder. And they can also only assume they have their man.
But McNamara demands
a court martial, and because Hart was a second-year law student at Yale
before the war, he gets appointed Scott's counsel. And so begins a cat
and mouse game among three officers: McNamara, Hart, and the head of
the camp, Major Visser (a cadaverous Marcel Iures).
Despite the obvious
lines drawn by the war, director Hoblit lets us enjoy Visser just enough
to doubt who the real villains are. The character is a realist and a
Yale grad himself, aware that war makes unlikely friends and enemies.
Crucially to the theme, Visser also understands that any war death is
both tragic and by its very nature necessary. When countries clash,
sacrifices get made. The question Hoblit and novelist John Katzenbach
pose is how to choose who gets sacrificed.
McNamara has his
own answer for that: anybody who doesn't measure up to his ideals. He
may lecture the Germans on how Americans don't make distinctions among
races, but that's only when Russian lives are at stake.
Yes, the explosions
do occur, as the result of a German plane getting shot down over the
camp. Clearing the wreckage sparks an idea in McNamara's mind, and Hoblit
keeps it from us for as long as possible. Though it becomes obvious
to us far before Hart figures it out, it's still just an excuse to tackle
a larger theme.
|
Who has the dorkiest
hat?
|
Like all of Hoblit's
films so far, Hart's War has a few twists and turns that keep
it from being too routine. Most of them here come from the star power
enlisted for the cast. Willis pulls his usual underplaying here, and
it works pretty well up to a point. And as the prison commander, Iures
resists the temptation to chew scenery. He smirks with the best of the
screen villains, but underneath is a hollow sadness, made even a little
tragic by how good Visser is at his job.
The real one to
watch, though, is Hart himself. Colin Farrell will strike many as a
newcomer, though Hollywood has been buzzing about him for over a year.
Mostly, though, he has made movies with limited or no release, so the
hype has almost engulfed him.
But unlike such
hyped heroes as Matthew McConaughey, Farrell is the real deal. He has
a power and a presence, though it may be more suited to playing villainous
roles. His conflicted Lieutenant really comes to life when trying to
get out of trouble. If Farrell has a weakness, it lies in portraying
outrage. And indeed, fanboys, Farrell starts shooting next month as
Bullseye in the film Daredevil.
Ultimately, everything
comes to a head that undercuts its message. Whether it be test screening
damage or not, Hoblit opts for a finale that feels unsatisfying, but
obviously easier than where the story really should have headed.
Yet there's enough
presented here to provoke some discussion and make you wish for a deeper
look. In the flurry of gung ho war movies that are now in vogue, it's
good to see one challenge the notion of our boys having been purely
noble. And in this time of uncertainty, it's also necessary to ponder
the fact that sometimes the good guys do have to die in order to win.
It's not pretty, but it's necessary.
What's It Worth?
$6