| The 
                      HitchHiker's Guide To The Galaxy:One Fan's Refutation
  
                  Editor's Note: We ran a preview of this 
                      film a couple of months back, which was highly positive. 
                      Contributor Andrew Simchik, having now seen the movie, would 
                      like his say as a long-time fan... As 
                      is now well recorded, there is a movie adaptation out based 
                      on that wholly remarkable book, The Hitchhiker's Guide to 
                      the Galaxy. This has made a lot of people very angry and 
                      is generally regarded as a bad move. My girlfriend 
                      and I grabbed some friends and went to see this adaptation. 
                      I didn't expect to love it, and I didn't expect to hate 
                      it, and both expectations were fully met. It could have 
                      and should have been much better; it could have been and 
                      thankfully wasn't much worse. If I'd gone to see it alone 
                      I probably would have told you it was awful, but I didn't, 
                      and my girlfriend really liked it. This last fact truly 
                      surprised me and gave credence to the hypothesis that my 
                      negative reaction had a lot to do with being a fan of the 
                      series in its earlier forms. So while 
                      my overall reaction is negative, to be fair, I'm going to 
                      post the top 10 things I liked about the movie and the top 
                      10 things I hated, so it all evens out. My short opinion 
                      is this:  
                    If you 
                      have never read the books or heard the radio series, you 
                      should see this movie first. You won't have any idea how 
                      good it could be, and you'll have some wonderful visuals 
                      to take with you into the other versions, and there won't 
                      be anywhere to go but up. The best analogy I can make with 
                      this movie is David Lynch's Dune: everyone agrees it's an 
                      overacted, overcondensed mess, but I saw it before I ever 
                      read the books and I doubt I would have fallen in love with 
                      them without seeing Lynch's visually splendid, bizarre, 
                      enchanting (but disowned) take first.  
                      If you are already a fan, who are you kidding? You're going 
                    to want to see it anyway, so just get it over with. Top 
                      10 Reasons I Enjoyed the Movie  1. 
                      Opening with the dolphins. Very suited to the tone of the 
                      series. I was so glad it didn't start with space or something. 
                      They only flubbed part of the joke, too.  2. 
                      The Book. Stephen Fry is just reading it straight but he's 
                      a worthy successor to the brilliant Peter Jones. The graphics 
                      are terrific, and the jokes are relatively unexpurgated. 
                      I'm concernedthat people who don't know this series will wonder why it's 
                      named after a book that's tangential to the story, but that's 
                      my only complaint.
  3. 
                      The theme. Not the "So Long, and Thanks for All the 
                      Fish" song -- that's in the next list. I mean the instrumental 
                      theme that introduced each radio episode, the one they play 
                      after the story's gotten underway in the movie. Good on 
                      them for keeping that in.  4. 
                      Ford Prefect. I have serious complaints about the way Mos 
                      Def mumbled his lines, but I have similar complaints about 
                      nearly everyone else. Otherwise I actually thought he was 
                      brilliant; the most authentically alien Ford Prefect we've 
                      ever really seen or heard, thoroughly weird and charming 
                      all at once. Hideously underused, unfortunately, but they 
                      did add a good flashback (how he and Arthur first meet). 
                      There are even a couple of mildly homoerotic moments between 
                      him and Arthur. Fun all around, really.  5. 
                      Paper bag callback. As part of a brief montage during Prostetnic 
                      Vogon Jeltz's speech to the Earth, we see that the folks 
                      in Arthur's local pub have decided to lie down with paper 
                      bags over their heads. Great callback, and the sort of visual 
                      joke you can't really pull off in a book or radio series. 
                      Just barely beats out the lightning-fast Gag Halfrunt moment 
                      because it's funny to non-fans too.  6. 
                      The effects of the Improbability Drive. It's understandable 
                      that they condensed the bits about Ford being "a perfectly 
                      safe penguin, and my colleague here is rapidly running out 
                      of limbs!" into the two of them becoming sofas (my 
                      girlfriend said, "no, stay sofas!" and meant it 
                      nicely), and this really gets fun halfway through the movie 
                      when the Heart of Gold materializes as a ball of knitting 
                      and the crew are rendered for a short time as animated yarn 
                      characters. I will pay someone to knit me those. SO. CUTE.  7. 
                      Huggable Marvin. He's almost disturbingly huge but otherwise 
                      totally adorable. An excellent design choice, marketable 
                      as hell, and believe me I'm first in line for the stuffed 
                      toy or even the action figure.  8. 
                      Worshipping the Great Green Arkleseizure. A throwaway joke 
                      from the book becomes a short but pretty funny church scene. 
                      "Amen" becomes "Achoo," to which John 
                      Malkovich's creepazoid pseudoPope Humma Kavula replies, 
                      "Bless you." That's pretty brilliant.  9. 
                      Slartibartfast. I wish he'd delivered some of the lines 
                      more crisply, but Bill Nighy is always enjoyable and as 
                      Slartibartfast doubly so. Best of all, they kept one of 
                      the best exchanges fromArthur's encounter with the fjord designer (paraphrased): 
                      "I'd rather be happy than right any day." "And 
                      are you? Happy, I mean." "Not really, no. That's 
                      where it falls down a bit, you see."
  10. 
                      The Earth Mark II. There's a point near the end where it 
                      seems like Arthur is going to just get his old house back 
                      on the replacement Earth. This actually would have been 
                      a terrific way to make the story self-contained. It's not 
                      quite this simple, of course, but the suggestion, combined 
                      with the fantastic and hilarious visuals of the second Earth 
                      being built, easily makes the top 10 list. Top 
                      10 Reasons I Disliked the Movie  A lot 
                      of these were things that my girlfriend also disliked, so 
                      I know they're not just fanboy whining.  1. 
                      Zaphod W. Beeblebush. If I grit my teeth hard and squint 
                      until the vein in my temple throbs, I can see the cleverness 
                      of having Sam Rockwell play Zaphod as Robin Williams doing 
                      George W. Bush. It fits with Adams' bits about the role 
                      of the Galactic President being not to wield power but to 
                      draw attention away from it. And he does look the part, 
                      and the voice and attitude aren't too far off. But he comes 
                      off as such a complete idiot that the loss of one of his 
                      heads doesn't seem to alter his character appreciably, and 
                      most of the time he flails at random with no clear motivation 
                      or stable personality. So one of the best characters in 
                      the original story is thoroughly wasted. The treatment of 
                      the two heads is so ridiculous that I would rather they 
                      had just ignored this inconvenient character trait (it's 
                      usually irrelevant anyway), but it could have floated if 
                      everything else had worked.  2. 
                      Too much of the Vogons. I get that they probably wanted 
                      to get a lot of value out of the Henson suits they made, 
                      and they were forced to carry most of the "isn't bureaucracy 
                      stupid and hilarious?" motif that recurs in Adams' 
                      oeuvre. But they're pretty tiresome, and it would have been 
                      nice to see more of the kaleidoscopic variety of alien forms 
                      (if only to help reinforce another Adams motif, "no 
                      matter what they look like, most aliens are a lot like the 
                      people you meet every day"). The multitorsoed Japanese 
                      schoolgirl was, I'm sorry, kind of dumb.  3. 
                      Random motivations and loose ends. Do you believe Zaphod 
                      wanted to find the Ultimate Question? I might have, if the 
                      script and Sam Rockwell had sold it; after all, in the books 
                      he wants to find out who rules the universe. But why does 
                      he want it so badly he lets Humma Kavula hold one of his 
                      heads hostage, then never goes back to retrieve the head? 
                      Does Kavula not care that he never gets the gun? Why even 
                      include this plot element if you're not going to resolve 
                      it until the next movie (if ever)? The structure of the 
                      radio series is comic sketches linked by comic monologues; 
                      we could very easily have had that same structure in this 
                      movie, but instead the plot was stitched together by a blind 
                      tailor with a drinking problem.  4. 
                      Deep Thought. Hard to believe they could screw this up. 
                      But they rushed it in terms of script and direction, Helen 
                      Mirren rushed it in terms of delivery, and so another of 
                      the funniest and most meaningful sequences in the whole 
                      books is, I'm guessing, lost on the uninitiated. The design 
                      is cute, though, almost as good as Marvin's. If only we 
                      knew why Deep Thought watches cartoons (a cheap, meaningless 
                      non-joke) or guards the Point-of-View Gun.  5. 
                      Trillian & Arthur (tie). Arthur is well-cast but unsympathetically 
                      written and acted. He's a plausible Everyman in the radio 
                      series and the books, like many of us interested primarily 
                      inthe comforts of one's own home, a nice cup of tea, and knowing 
                      one's planet will still be there in the morning. Here he's 
                      a blustering coward with delusions of grandeur and the hormones 
                      and common sense of a 14-year-old, proving once again why 
                      everyone likes Han Solo better
 than Luke Skywalker (unfortunately, see above regarding 
                      Zaphod, our should-be Han Solo). The Arthur fans know and 
                      love would have suggested Cornwall for a date because running 
                      off to Madagascar on a moment's notice is a romantic whim; 
                      a reasonable person reads a guidebook or two and packs proper 
                      supplies instead of blundering into the forest like a loud 
                      stupid tourist. This Arthur just seems small-minded and 
                      parochial.
 But 
                      Trillian is just as bad. Zooey Deschanel looks the part 
                      (dark-haired, pretty, not a complete bimbo) and honestly 
                      I thought she made the most of what she had to work with. 
                      Unfortunately, what she had to work with sucked. It wasn't 
                      just the missed opportunity for this character to finally 
                      get the respect Adams set her up to deserve (as originally 
                      written she has a "degree in astrophysics and another 
                      in mathematics," so as she puts it it's either run 
                      off with Zaphod to see the galaxy or "back to the dole 
                      queue on Monday"). It's that there's really nothing 
                      to fill the void, and she has to make us believe that her 
                      best romantic options were, at one point before the Earth 
                      exploded, the utterly vapid Zaphod or the utterly wretched 
                      Arthur, and that choosing between them is her highest priority. 
                      See below.  6. 
                      Unbreakable Marvin. In the books Marvin is almost indestructible; 
                      a laser to the head is not a more serious problem than the 
                      pain in all the diodes down his left side. But that's no 
                      big deal. What bothered me is that they clumsily show him 
                      "dead" (the lights in his eyes go out) just to 
                      tug at your heartstrings, and then with no explanation or 
                      provocation whatsoever have him come back to life and somehow 
                      pick up the gun with no one noticing. Was he recharging? 
                      Temporarily "unconscious"? Who knows? It just 
                      said in the script that someone should get hurt here so 
                      we could have a little emotional dip and then a rise again 
                      when he turns out to be okay after all. Awwww! It could 
                      have been any of the characters and it still would have 
                      been stupid, stupid, stupid.  7. 
                      "So Long, and Thanks For All the Sk8er Bois." 
                      Do you hate it when this really clever line will come up 
                      in a song, and you think, "wow, brilliant!" and 
                      then it's ruined because the singer realizes how brilliant 
                      it is and repeats it over and over? Like in the Smiths' 
                      "Sweet and Tender Hooligan," when Morrissey sings 
                      "in the midst of life we are in death, et cetera" 
                      (hilarious) and then proceeds to vamp that line into the 
                      ground? That was the effect, for me, of openingwith a great bit like the "second most intelligent 
                      species on Earth" dolphin stuff and then making their 
                      final message to humanity into a stupid little ditty. I 
                      didn't realize until later that they'd ripped off the verse 
                      melody from Avril Lavigne's "Complicated," adding 
                      injury to insult.
 And 
                      don't get me started on the incidental music score. Incidental 
                      music is like perfume or cologne: figure out the absolute 
                      minimum you think you need to get you through the next two 
                      hours, and then use a quarter of that. Most movies these 
                      days are like that over-made-up middle-aged woman who sits 
                      next to you on the plane smelling like she just did ten 
                      laps in an Olympic-sized pool of Chanel No. 5.  8. 
                      The tone. This wasn't as far off as it could have been. 
                      But it was off. Much of the problem was caused by the next 
                      two points, to be fair, and much of the rest of it was caused 
                      by the demands of making a movie out of a serial. It felt 
                      to me like the difference between the original Dr. Who series 
                      and the TV movie with Paul McGann; in both cases it seemed 
                      as though the Britishness of the original was being downplayed 
                      in the later adaptation. This goes beyond accents and into 
                      worldviews. Adams wasn't trying to write funny science fiction, 
                      any more than George Orwell was setting out to write a dramatic 
                      story about farm animals. Adams was writing satire, and 
                      science fiction happened to be the ideal stage for that 
                      satire. The points of the satire -- life is amazing, inscrutable, 
                      random, and ridiculous; culture is culture, petty, bureaucratic, 
                      greedy, but charmingly so and mostly harmless; the best 
                      things in life are food, drink, and a comfortable place 
                      to sleep -- are not completely lost in the movie, but they 
                      are far weaker than they ought to be.  9. 
                      The dialogue. Contrary to what I'd read, they didn't cut 
                      out all the jokes. But they cut out many of them, and flubbed 
                      a lot more through needless editing and horrible delivery. 
                      The dialogue is by far the best part of the original series, 
                      as you might imagine, because Adams was a comedy writer 
                      and because he mercilessly edited and reedited each radio 
                      episode until it was perfect. Granted, each episode was 
                      30 minutes long, but the first four episodes cover the whole 
                      of the movie. Why they had to snip lines and parts of lines 
                      that would have taken mere seconds to speak in full I've 
                      no idea. However, most of what they used instead was meaningless 
                      grunting ("look out," "uh-oh, what?", 
                      that sort of thing) and the delivery was as far from crisp 
                      as it gets. There were exchanges I literally could not understand 
                      because the actors rushed and mumbled them. There were a 
                      few witty new bits (Trillian's "it won't work on me, 
                      I'm already a woman," for example), but most of it 
                      just fell flat to me. The original dialogue is usually as 
                      honed, set-em-up-and-knock-em-down as the Simpsons, and 
                      I have to figure that even new audiences could see that 
                      this wasn't like that at all.  10. 
                      The romance. I don't think anyone who went to see this with 
                      me liked the romance between Trillian and Arthur that took 
                      over the story. There was even a totally sketched-in, meaningless 
                      thing between Zaphod and Vice President Questular. I'm at 
                      a loss for words (finally, you're thinking) but let me just 
                      say: no chemistry, no plausibility, no point. Romance is 
                      fine in a satire like Candide because Candide is a would-be 
                      romantic hero. Arthur Dent is a philosophical hero, and 
                      the philosophical tone is all but completely wrecked by 
                      the Hollywood insistence on bringing romance to the forefront 
                      of the story. Think carefully about the role of romance 
                      in two of the best-scripted films I've seen in the last 
                      ten years, Monsters Inc. and Finding Nemo. It's there, but 
                      it's part of life and not the focus of the story or the 
                      reason for the heroes' personalities. That's the role it 
                      should have played here as well. Titanic this ain't.
  
                       
                       |