HOME ABOUT SUPPORT US SITES WE LIKE FORUM Search Fanboyplanet.com | Powered by Freefind FANBOY PLANET
ON TV COMICS WRESTLING INTERVIEWS NOW SHOWING GRAB BAG
 
Wrestling Today's Date:

Chair Shots

8-30-02

Everybody wants to rule the world.

Smackdown Run Down (in the style of Dennis Miller)
Smackdown has the deeper roster between the two shows, yet week after week they find new and creative ways to have the same 2-3 guys wrestle twice on a show.

Not that I'm complaining about watching Eddie Guerrero and Chris Benoit wrestle, but it's becoming obvious that Smackdown writers don't have any ideas for guys like Faaroq, Randy Orton, Godfather and Albert. Hmmm, I don't either.

Now I don't want to get off on a rant here but after botching the first night of the new "Brock Lesnar Era" on Monday, Smackdown did what Raw should have and gave Brock a midcard wrestler to destroy. Rock jobbed to Brock on Sunday and left us with the question "who can beat Brock?"

Until a challenger arises, Brock should mow through the talent roster like Robert Downey Jr. at an "all you can snort cocaine buffet." God knows that watching Brock beat the crap out of Matt Hardy was far more entertaining than watching Undertaker and Triple H have their 1 millionth match. Save it for the "Used to be WWE Superstars Tour 2023", fellas.

The federation has had a recent run of losing touch with what the fans want and this can't be more evident than giving the Undertaker the number one contendership. Do we really want to see a guy that was hitting his peak 10 years ago and hasn't actually applied a wrestling hold in 20 years wrestle our "next big thing" Brock Lesnar? Don't we get enough of that from Hogan and Flair?

I can see where the writers are taking us. They think we think the Undertaker is some massive presence in the WWE that can stop Brock rather than what we actually see: an old guy with a cool entrance that took fashion tips from Limp Bizkit.

If they are serious about making Undertaker the number one contender then they have got to make us care and believe that Taker can do it. Roll the clock back on the "American Bad Ass" to a time when he was the "Undead Bad Ass." When many long time fans look at the Undertaker, they still see the hulking, undead, unstoppable Danzig reject that became an early nineties icon along with Paul Bearer. Once upon a time we believed that the Undertaker could take a banzai drop from Yokozuna and sit right back up like a 13 year old with his Grandad's Viagra prescription.

If the WWE reestablishes Undertaker as an unstoppable force then, and only then, will fans care about a title match with the immovable object, Brock Lesnar. If there isn't a change up in Undertaker's stale old character, the writers should at least throw Kane into that spot since they are similar and Kane hasn't had a title shot in years.

Oops, too late for that. Kane is too busy doing the Kane-a-roonie like a cartoon mascot for Der Wienerschnitzel.

My apathy only grows for the current crop of wrestling baby faces when I see guys like Rikishi being pushed. Why put Rikishi over Eddie last night and then have him lose later to Chris Benoit? Benoit wasn't even allowed to beat him cleanly since Rikishi was injured during a previous attack. Was anyone cheering for Rikishi during either of his matches? Wouldn't wrestling purists have preferred Eddie beating Rikishi and then having a match with Benoit? Benoit could have still won under the guise that Eddie had already wrestled twice that night and the ending of the show would be unchanged.

Edge lost any baby face momentum he got coming off SummerSlam with a loss to Eddie early in the show. D-Von and Bautista still haven't decided who's the baby face and who's the heel in their feud. At this point, the most over baby face in the WWE is Rey Mysterio Jr.

You can't tell me that fans wouldn't pay money to see Rey Mysterio vs. Brock Lesnar. That match up has everything going for it from the David vs. Goliath aspect to the subtle theme of the ethnic struggle against the white man. I'm talking box office cha-ching with this one, babe.

Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

McMahons at Walmart?
Thanks, Dennis. In other news: The WWE announced this week that Vince and Linda McMahon will not receive bonuses this year due to a downturn in business. Declining ratings and lower pay-per-view purchases mean that Vince and Linda will be giving up their bonuses which have historically totaled over a million dollars combined.

A Reuters story reports Vince McMahon was paid $900,000 and Linda McMahon was paid $675,000 in bonuses last year. But don't expect the see Vince and Linda clipping coupons from their Sunday paper, as they will continue to draw their regular salaries of 750k to 1 million dollars a year.

Ratings
Raw scored a 4.0 cable rating this week which mates last week's rating. That can be considered somewhat of a let down since it's the show following a big PPV. Raw usually takes a jump in the ratings following a PPV. Smackdown rating was down this week to 3.1 broadcast rating. Last week the show scored a 3.6. however last night's broadcast was pre-empted in many markets with baseball games. The show didn't air at all in New York, Baltimore and Florida.

Goldberg Stuff
Goldberg returned to pro-wrestling last night in Japan. He faced and won a match against Satoshi Kojima at the All Japan show in Budokan Hall. Reports say it was the usual 4 minute Goldberg style of match we've seen a hundred times in WCW. This was Goldberg's first wrestling match since the demise of WCW. Welcome back Goldberg.

Also this week Goldberg was announced as having been cast in the new Warner Brothers movie, "Loony Tunes: Back in Action." Much like Space Jam, the film will feature live actors appearing with famous Looney Toon characters. Brendan Fraser, Heather Locklear, Bugs Bunny and Jenna Elfman have also signed on with the film.

Have a great holiday weekend and I'll see you again on Tuesday.

Michael Goodson

Our Friends:



Official PayPal Seal

Copyrights and trademarks for existing entertainment (film, TV, comics, wrestling) properties are held by their respective owners and are used with permission or for promotional purposes of said properties. All other content ™ and © 2001, 2014 by Fanboy Planet™.
"The Fanboy Planet red planet logo is a trademark of Fanboy Planetâ„¢
If you want to quote us, let us know. We're media whores.
Movies | Comics | Wrestling | OnTV | Guest | Forums | About Us | Sites
Google